Carry That Weight

On May 15th, 2014, Emma Sulkowitz, a student at Columbia University, wrote a piece for Time entitled “My Rapist is Still on Campus“. “I was raped by a fellow classmate the first day of my sophomore year” it begins. “Ultimately they decided he wasn’t guilty… every day, I am afraid to leave my room.”

A visual arts major, Sulkowitz decided to use her rape, and the mishandling of it by the university, as inspiration for her senior thesis. She made headlines when photographs of her carrying her 50-pound, extra-long twin mattress around the university emerged online. She was raped in her own bed, in her dorm room, and her performance piece is a protest against the manner in which her case was dealt with. Her rapist is not only still walking freely around the campus, despite the fact that two other students have shared stories of their sexual assaults by him, but she has also faced threats from fellow students for speaking out about it.

Today, in solidarity with the many victims of sexual assault and domestic violence, students, staff, faculty, and everyday citizens across the country took part in Carry That Weight marches through their respective cities. Named after Sulkowitz’s performance piece, the marches aimed to convey that “carrying a mattress with others brings us together to collectively help carry the weight, shows our shared support for survivors, and our collective commitment to working together toward cultural and community-level change to end sexual and domestic violence” [x].

I headed to the University of East Anglia campus at noon, where a group of feminists had organised their own Carry That Weight march. In their interpretation of the message, they had adorned pillowcases with messages of solidarity, and created a large banner bearing the words “Carry That Weight Against Sexual Violence”. A large mattress, carried by 4 participants, led the hour-long march from the campus and into the main city, where passing cars honked their horns and pedestrians stared in curiosity.

All photos copyright Sophie Elliott 2014. Please email sophieejourno@gmail.com if you’re interested in using them.

Lagerfeld’s “Feminist” Chanel Catwalk and the Commercialisation of Feminism.

Imagine this: an army of women saunter confidently towards you. Many of them carry placards, with messages such as “history is her story” and “ladies first”. At the front of the troop walks a woman dressed in a plaid suit, who is carrying a megaphone and demanding to know “what do we want?!”. On each side of the long line of women are photographers, determined to get the perfect shot of this display of protestation.

I can think no scenario better.

Now imagine this: every woman in the protest group is thin. Every woman is young. Every woman is beautiful with regards to Western ideals. Few – if any – of these women are women of colour. The protest is staged, in order to sell ready-to-wear high-fashion garments. The photographers are paid to be there. The women are professional models. And the man who has arranged the whole thing is a raging misogynist.

chanel chanelll

On the 30th of September, Karl Lagerfeld transformed his Chanel ready-to-wear fashion show into a faux street entitled Boulevard Chanel No.5. He sent some of the most popular Western models, led by Cara Delevingne, down the street carrying placards that appeared to encourage feminist activism. He even sent a lone male model down the catwalk at one point with a sign reading “HeForShe”, a not-so-subtle nod toward Emma Watson’s speech at the UN from the previous week.

So what’s the problem?

Feminism has become quite popular recently. Not with regards to actual activism and feminist conversation, but as a medium through which to sell. Clothes, makeup, deodorant, food, and shoes have all been subject to advertisements that appear to encourage women’s liberation whilst simultaneously oppressing women. The movement has become commercialised to the point where sparkly “feminist” and Venus sign necklaces are available in abundance on the internet. And this is no different. In fact, this is far worse.

High fashion is an industry that is determinedly and inherently anti-feminist. High fashion is an industry that dictates what exactly women should look like each season. High fashion is an industry that encourages unhealthy weight obsessions, due to their aversion to using models any larger than a size 0 (size 4 or below in England). High fashion is an industry that frequently uses images of decapitated, deceased, and sexually assaulted women in their print editorials. High fashion is an industry that perpetuates racial stereotypes and refuses to represent women of colour on the same level as white women. High fashion is an industry that fetishizes and sexualises the idea of youth.

Lagerfeld appears to have suddenly had a change of heart from the problematic opinions he’s voiced in the past. His comment of “I don’t see why every human being is not on the same level, especially in my business”, which was directed at reporters after his successful show, is a far cry from his comments of: “No one wants to see curvy women. You’ve got fat mothers with their bags of chips sitting in front of the television and saying thin models are ugly. Fashion is about dreams and illusionfrom 2009, or his claim that Coco Chanel could not have been a feminist because “[she] was never ugly enough for that” in Harper’s Bazaar.

His ‘feminist’ fashion show is nothing more than a cry for attention – and it seems to have worked. He has manipulated and taken advantage of the fact that feminism is currently trendy, and has used this fact to further increase the popularity of his brand.

But what does this mean for modern feminism? There is a chance – a small chance – that this will be a positive thing. That it will encourage younger women to research and educate themselves on feminism. That it will persuade them that ‘feminism’ is not a scary word.

Maybe – but probably not. Feminism and fashion are polar opposites of one another. One disseminates the concept of ideals, expectations, and the perfect image. The other is inclusive, non-discriminatory, and reminds women that they are not defined by their appearance. High fashion is the industry that dictates this season’s trends and style. With Lagerfeld focussing an entire show on the concept of feminism, it can only be assumed that other labels will follow suit. Feminism, a movement that is already commercialised to the point of appropriation, is going to be ‘in’ this season. But the version of feminism that is going to be ‘in’ is the type that Lagerfeld perpetuated in his show – young, skinny, beautiful, and white.

Photo source
Find this post on the Parallel Magazine blog.

Parallel Magazine

tNot too long ago, I made a blog post about wanting to start up a magazine. I appealed for fellow feminists to apply for the positions, advertised it everywhere from Reddit to underground feminist forums, and nervously waited for emails to arrive. And, to begin with, nothing happened, and I thought about removing all and any trace of the post from the internet altogether. But then, slowly but surely, more and more feminists got into contact with me to state their interest. As time went on, the more enthusiastic they seemed. And, a month and a half later, I had over a hundred emails to sift through.

I chose a team of 21 feminists. Located all across the world, from Tasmania to Cincinnati, they are some of the most creative, interesting, and eager women I have ever had the fortune to talk to, and have put all their energy into turning Parallel Magazine from a daydream and into a reality. We’ve been working since the start of August on the magazine, starting off with a brainstorming session to work out what everyone’s individual ideas were, and moving on to assigning articles and coming up with an aesthetic. We have a logo. We have our social media sites. We have our content. We have our media and advertiser packs. We have our design guidelines. We even have some kick-ass interviews coming up!

But what we don’t have is the funding.

So we’ve set up a Kickstarter.
(Yes, unfortunately this is a shameless self-advertisement.)

Below are the details of the magazine, and how to get involved.

 

What is it?

Parallel is going to be a new women’s magazine that focuses on life through a feminist lens. Aimed at late teenage to young adult women, Parallel hopes to be a magazine that can introduce young women to the concept of feminism through the use of informative articles, which will work alongside references to modern pop culture i.e. music, films, fashion, and art.It will hope to subvert the format of modern celebrity-centric and fashion-oriented magazines in order to discuss relevant issues in modern society.

Parallel will be liberating, and empowering. It will talk about activism and achievements. It will feature strong women who are really making a difference in this world. It will be intersectional in its content, discussing race, gender, sexuality, and disability. The key aim of Parallel is to initiate feminist discussion within mainstream society.

Why are we making it?

Women’s Magazines are several million pound industry in the UK. With over 200 titles to choose from, women buy on average almost 7 million magazines every month, and 38% of women in the UK trust magazines. And yet magazines that claim to be for women or that are supposedly sex positive are churning out article titles such as “Ten lazy ways to lose weight” or “12 Little Things Every Guy Wants in Bed”. Their cover images are sexualised, their articles are derogatory and weight-obsessed, and their fashion editorials are so photoshopped that even the real life models no longer look like that. They evoke unneeded competition between women. And it isn’t just about body image, the models used, or size zero clothing. It’s about the stories and article written, the way celebrities are scrutinized, and what questions female actors and musicians are asked in their interviews. While there’s nothing wrong with wanting to be beautiful, desirable, sexy, or trendy, what is problematic is the obsession with these things about all else, to the point where being beautiful is seen as life’s greatest achievement and all else pales in comparison.

So we’ve decided to make a difference, in the form of a new magazine: Parallel. The title is a play on the idea that feminism and modern popular culture are currently running parallel to one another. In order to get feminism into the minds of the mainstream youth, the two things need to intersect and combine. And that’s exactly what we plan to do. Our magazine will cover subjects regarding race, gender, sexuality, age, liberation, women’s rights, activism, disability, and more, all tied up together in an aesthetically pleasing, contemporary women’s magazine. We will subvert the format of ordinary celebrity or fashion magazines to highlight key issues in today’s world. We will interview and talk to influential women about their opinions, highlight key feminist community groups that you could get involved in, and will review, discuss, and critique women’s role in the media.

Parallel Magazine will discuss achievements outside of fashion and beauty, will talk about community and activism and how you, as a woman, can make a change to the world around you. It will focus on everything from art to pop culture to history – all through the viewpoint of a modern young feminist. But we need your help.

What can I do?

In order to get the magazine published, we need a readership, and that starts with you. The first issue is due to be released in January 2015, so effectively your donations will be acting as pre-orders for the magazine. You can either pre-order one issue, or buy a year’s subscription. Each option comes with the choice of no goodie bag, a small goodie bag, or a large goodie bag. For anyone interested in advertising, forming a partnership, or sponsoring us, we would prefer you to contact us before donating any money as we do have terms and conditions. The email address can be found below.

You can also get directly involved in several different ways.

Submissions:

Our first issue is open for submissions on the theme of “Liberation”, and we will accept anything from artwork to creative writing to articles to reviews.

Features:

We are currently looking to talk to/feature/review the following people/groups/events:

  • Female bands/musicians and/or upcoming album releases/gigs
  • Female art collectives and/or upcoming exhibitions
  • Feminist activist collectives
  • Feminist community groups
  • Independent feminist films
  • Feminist zines

Events:

If you have an event you’d either like us to review, or add to our events listing page, please send us an email.

I am #unashamedlyfeminist because…

To show your support to the magazine, send us photos or videos of yourself explaining why YOU are #unashamedly feminist. Your photo or video will be featured on our social media sites, including our blog, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Sponsor us or partner up with us:

If you want to sponsor us or form a partnership, please send us an email!

To get involved with any of the aforementioned subjects, please email us at parallelmageditor@gmail.com

What will donations be going towards?

Donations will be going towards several different things that are necessary to launch the magazine. This includes:

  • printing costs
  • trademarking the name
  • making a website
  • travel expenses for interviews and photoshoots
  • business cards
  • the launch party

Where can I find more information?

Our social media networks are constantly being updated. They can be found below.

Twitter / Facebook / Tumblr

We will also have Instagram and Youtube channels coming soon!

 

If you’re interested in helping us out and getting this magazine made, please back us on Kickstarter!

Ideas Fund Innovators

Last Tuesday, I was thrilled to discover that I’d been selected as one of the recipients of the IdeasTap “Ideas Fund Innovators” prize. The brief was to submit a pitch for a creative arts project, along with a budget and timeline, that wouldn’t be possible without the help of £500 extra funding. My pitch was for an exhibition I’ve had planned out for months, one that exhibits another side of my work that hasn’t been highlighted much on this blog so far, entitled Public Property.

I haven’t had the chance to hold an exhibition since 6th form, when me and the rest of my photography class were given the opportunity to exhibit our work at a “Man vs the Environment” themed exhibition at a local arts hub. I never had the money to take part in any exhibitions during university, and even missed out on the end-of-year exhibition that was supposed to display all graduating students’ work – and that would have cost me hundreds of pounds. And I’ve certainly never had the chance to host an exhibition that consists entirely of my own work, so I’m really excited and nervous to get started.

Due to all the work, planning, publishing, and building (yes, building) that has to be done, the exhibition is predicted to take place some time in February of next year. In the meantime, I’ll be updating you all with pictures, videos, and promotional material on this blog and via Twitter. I’m really hoping for the opening night to be a real event, with wine, speakers, and a nice big crowd. And that’s not me being narcissistic – I’m intending for the work that I display to carry some real messages, and the more people that see it the better.

Here’s the pitch I submitted:

Public Property will be a feminist exhibition featuring work that discusses modern culture with regards to marriage, rape, and body ownership. The work being exhibited will be created by myself, and will include: several photographic collections – one looking at body ownership, one focussing on forced marriages, and one that explores rape culture; an installation, which will take the form of a badly-made Wendy house, within which there will be video and voice recordings playing; and a self-published zine. Public Property will be exhibited in a local gallery in Norwich.

As well as that, you may have noticed further down on my blog that I have a call for submissions for a zine under the same name. The plan was always for the zine to be distributed at the exhibition, so I advertised for submissions preemptively, hoping that I would receive funding sooner or later. Now that I have, the zine will act as a way for other people to exhibit and display their work at the gallery – click here for details!

According to my timeline this next month is supposed to be spent getting together the photographic material, and compiling stories for the voice recordings to be played in the Wendy House. The aim of the voice recordings is for them to juxtapose against images and videos of modern rape culture (i.e. music videos, television representation), and so I’m looking to get examples of people’s experiences with rape, sexual violence, or sexual harrassment. Obviously this is a sensitive subject, so if you have something you want to share but aren’t comfortable sending me a recording of your own voice, simply send over a transcript that I can have a voice actor read out. And, of course, all submissions will be anonymous and will be treated with strict confidentiality. The stories will only be used for the exhibition, and will never be used without your permission. If you are interested to submit your story, be it a recording of your voice or simply a transcript, please email me at sophieejourno@gmail.com.

And, as always, thanks for the support. I hope I can count on you all to support and promote this exhibition as and when it happens!

In the meantime, and on a completely different note, I am closing applications for Parallel Magazine THIS FRIDAY, the 1st of August! Parallel Magazine is a startup feminist magazine, and I’m looking for photographers, writers, illustrators, graphic designers, and researchers to make up the original team. For more info, click here! As I said, submissions are closing on Friday so you only have 4 more days to get your application in.

The Damaging Effects of Lad Culture

Lad culture has been in the news a lot recently. Numerous accounts of public displays of sexism, misogyny, and examples of rape culture – attributed primarily to male university students and ‘lads’ – have been very publicly and outwardly criticised within the last couple of years. Just a few weeks ago, a Cambridge University drinking society was in the news, under investigation from police over a rape chant that the members were singing as they paraded around Oxford. Various onlookers described the men as being drunk and intimidating, and recounted that they were chanting words such as “rape”, “she’s too young”, and “15 years”.

Meanwhile, the president of the Oxford Union, 21-year-old student Ben Sullivan, was in the news after being arrested on suspicion of both the rape and attempted rape of two undergraduates. After being reinstated just a week after his arrest, various keynote speakers due to talk to the Oxford Union pulled out in protest – all but A C Grayling, renowned philosopher and founder of the independent undergraduate institution New College of the Humanities, who defended the president, saying he was “innocent until proven guilty” – and an open letter calling for his resignation has been written by OUSU Vice President for Women Sarah Pine, and signed by several feminist activists. While it may be the case that he is innocent of any crimes, statistics state that only 3% of rape accusations are false, and as stated by Sarah Pine in her open letter that calls for Sullivan’s resignation, “it’s not about making a pronouncement of innocence or guilt; but about the principle that whilst still under investigation for sexual offences, an individual should not remain in office“.

In 2010, the NUS report “Hidden Marks” revealed that 68% of respondents had faced one or more kinds of harassment at university as a student, and one in seven female students had experienced serious physical or sexual abuse. Only 4% had reported it to their university, and only 10% told the police. Half of those who didn’t report the incident said it was because they felt ashamed or embarrassed, and 43% said they thought they would be blamed for it.

And that is something that has become a worrying pattern with regards to sexual harassment within lad culture. Victim-blaming and slut-shaming are so prevalent, not only within the culture but also in the media, their own social circles, and amongst authoritative figures, that it leads many victims to believe that even if they were to report their abuse, they would not be believed or may even be blamed. I spoke to a small group of current and graduated students about their experiences of misogyny within lad culture; one girl I spoke to, Beth Saward, a student at the University of East Anglia, wrote an article for the F Word in which she described the reactions she received when she tried to talk about an example of harassment she’d had.

When I came to talk to my flatmates about it, I was told that if I hadn’t been flirting with him, or let him into our flat, he wouldn’t have got the wrong impression. It wasn’t just my flatmates either. It was the person appointed by the university to ensure we were all feeling safe and happy within our accommodation. The message I received from this incident was that if you’re a young woman and you talk to a man, you deserve everything you’ve got coming to you Because talking means sex. Surely”.

Everybody I spoke to agreed that one of the qualities of a stereotypical ‘lad’ was either a sexist attitude, or a sexist sense of humour. The problem with these qualities is that so many people are accepting of them. Most laddish behaviour is brushed off with the phrase “boys will be boys”, and things like rape jokes, misogynistic humour, or objectification of women are normalised as harmless “banter”.

Lad humour is not harmless banter. There is nothing harmless about the Imperial College newspaper Felix publishing a joke article encouraging male students to use the date rape drug rohypnol as a “fool proof way” to get laid on Valentine’s Day. There is nothing harmless about the promotional video for a Leeds club night called ‘Freshers Violation’ including sound bites from male students stating that the female freshers are going to “get raped”. There is nothing harmless about student fancy dress parties with the theme “rape victims”. There is nothing harmless about popular ‘lad’ websites like The Lad Bible, which has over a million likes on Facebook, objectifying women and encouraging men to see them as sex objects. There is nothing harmless about perpetuating rape culture. There is nothing harmless about lad culture.

Lad culture is basically just an extension of ‘boys will be boys'” said one student I spoke to, Jenni McNulty from the University of Leicester. “It is attempting to absolve men of all the responsibilities for their actions because they’re lads and couldn’t help it as it’s just the way they are.

It just isn’t good enough. Male feminist allies exist, as do men who go against the grain of lad culture. One male student at Leeds University admitted to the Leeds Student survey on lad culture that “I would not say that lad culture at the university is all in ‘good fun’. Lad culture is obnoxious and taken too far, potentially harmful.” Men are not inherently misogynistic. They are not born entitled.

In the nineteenth century, women were not permitted to go to university. The first UK university to allow coeducation was University College London in 1878. By 1895, over 10% of the graduates were women, and by 1990 the proportion had increased to 30%. In 1986, just two fifths of all full time undergraduates in the UK were women. Women overtook men as the majority of UK undergraduates in 1996, and by 2005, 57% of all first degree graduates were women.

Could it be, then, that lad culture is just another form of men trying to control women and to regain their dominance? Could it be that men are threatened by the fact that they are now the minority in an environment where they were, for a long time throughout history, the majority? Could it be that they are trying to compete against their female counterparts in a subconscious, subliminal way? “It goes hand in hand with women taking up more space, and men thinking that it means there is less space for them,” said Carmina Masoliver, a graduate from the UEA. “The more women have power, have an interest in feminist issues and have a voice, the more some men seem to want to challenge that“. Sexual harassment, verbal abuse, and rape culture are just a few ways in which lad culture presents itself in a university setting. They are all things that establish men as the dominating figure, giving them power over their female victims.

And what is particularly disturbing is how this power threatens modern feminism.

Take, for example, the concept of male entitlement. In believing and perpetuating the idea that women are simply there as sexual gratification for men, male entitlement objectifies and belittles the very existence of women. Lad culture takes this one step further, by disseminating the concept through ‘banter’ and suggesting that anyone who disagrees is stuck-up or incapable of taking a joke. It also challenges women’s sexual liberation, by taking the control out of the grasp of the women being targeted. Whilst it may be their choice to go home with and have sex with someone involved in lad culture, that choice is, in the eyes of the lad, predetermined and inevitable. “I was on a bar crawl with my course friends that ended up at our university’s SU bar. I noticed two guys standing at the edge of the crowd… what they were doing was picking girls out in the crowd, pointing them out to each other, rating them (by holding up a certain amount of fingers) and proceeding to make rude gestures. It was like watching lions preparing to prey on their victims,” recalled Jenni McNulty in her interview.

This ties into another example, which is that lad culture focuses primarily on appearance. Rating women in clubs is obviously degrading and demeaning, but what happens to the women that aren’t deemed attractive enough? In March of last year, two of the top-rated student debaters in the world faced heckling and jibes about their appearance as they competed in a prestigious competition at Glasgow University Union. “Banter shags”, competitions in which lads attempt to pull the least attractive women in the club, exist in several forms: from “fat girl rodeo“, where lads attempt to “grab ‘fat’ woman in a club, and hang on to her yelling “yee-hah”, until they throw you off, or dance up close to them, “acting nice,” aka pretending to be a normal human being, then whisper that they are ‘a minger’, and try to hang on for as long as they can“; to “pull a pig”, where they simply try to have sex with the least attractive girl they can find. This behaviour is influenced, no doubt, by the beauty and weight obsessed media, but it is extremely dangerous – particularly in a university setting. These women are studying alongside these ‘lads’ that are judging them based on their physical appearance and nothing more. These women are just as capable and able to become scientists, professors, artists, engineers, but are being humiliated and dehumanised by their male peers. These women are being given the message that men are meant for success and power, whilst women are condemned to be valued by their sexuality and appearance alone; that ugly women are destined for failure, simply for not living up to society’s standards.

In Naomi Wolfe’s The Beauty Myth, she talks about how “we are in the midst of a violent backlash against feminism that uses images of female beauty as a political weapon against women’s advancement”. That book was written in the 1990s: the case is still the same today.

But, of course, lad culture doesn’t exist entirely of men. In situations where lads fail to one-up or intimidate their female competition, they instead draw them into the culture by giving them titles such as ‘honorary lad’ or ‘ladette': if a woman can hold her drink or is complicit in sexist ‘banter’, she’s “one of the lads”. This influences the already-present internalised misogyny that exists in a lot of women, and encourages women to compete against, and degrade, one another to impress and fit in with the guys. “When I started university I wouldn’t necessarily even know something was bad due to the fact that it is so normalised“, admits Carmina Masoliver in her interview. Radhiki Sanghanin agrees in her article about her own experiences with lad culture: “It was just what everyone did, and even though we occasionally felt uncomfortable, we were spurred on by alcohol and peer pressure“. The alternative to succumbing to lad culture peer pressure is to be ritualistically humiliated and degraded.

This problem needs to be targeted. If it isn’t, women may be put off by the idea of going to university altogether, putting men in the position of power when it comes to education, job prospects, and money. Lad culture propaganda may successfully turn more and more women against each other in a battle of aesthetics and internalised misogyny. But what can actually be done to tackle lad culture?

In February, the National Union of Students called for a summit to discuss the findings of their “That’s What She Said” report, and have created a National Strategy Planning Committee to develop policies regarding sexism in institutions of higher education across the UK. The National Strategy Team (NST) is made up of students, student union staff, and organisations such as the Everyday Sexism and No More Page 3 projects.

Keynote speaker and National Strategy Ambassador, Laura Bates, said at the summit:

It is absolutely vital to address the problem of lad culture at UK universities head on. Recent events, from the ‘Fresher’s Violation’ club night advertised with a video of a male student saying he would rape a female peer, to university drinking societies going out in casual rape T-shirts and playing ‘it’s not rape if…’ drinking games, to name but a few, make it clear that these are not isolated occurrences but part of a larger culture that risks having a serious negative impact on students’ academic experiences. For too long this kind of behaviour has been dismissed as ‘boys being boys’ but to describe it as such is insulting to the vast majority of young men, and unhelpful to the female students who desperately need support and real action. For this reason I wholeheartedly welcome the National Union of Students’ proactive response to this issue, from undertaking research to reveal the extent of the problem to developing a national strategy to tackle it. I am proud to be the National Strategy Ambassador

As well as this, Feminist Societies at universities have grown in number significantly since the emergence of lad culture. And they aren’t just sitting around debating – they are actively protesting, and spreading feminist messages across the country. More than 20 universities banned Robin Thicke’s controversial song Blurred Lines last year due to the efforts of on-campus feminists. Bristol University’s FemSoc creates their own quarterly magazine called “That’s What She Said“, which addresses feminist issues, and also have a feminist radio station called FemFM. Nottingham’s FemSoc are currently drawing up a Lad Culture Pledge with their SU officers, liberation officers, sports team captains, and society presidents: “it is a pledge with a clear definition of Lad Culture, examples of and why it cannot be tolerated. We’re hoping to use existing harassment and discrimination (regarding gender, disability, race and sexual orientation) policy at the University to prevent and to sanction groups that contribute to ‘Lad’ and rape culture” explained Hannah Eachus in an email to me. Oxford University has introduced Good Lad workshops for their male society leaders, which attempt to “empower men to deal with complex gender situations and become agents of positive change within their social circles“. The UEA have one of the most active online presences of all of FemSoc groups in the UK, with Tumblr, WordPress, Twitter, and Facebook pages on which they frequently update their followers with articles, updates, and campaigns.

The online presence of these feminist societies is important. The internet is one of the quickest and easiest forms of communication, and allows news to spread quickly. The Leeds nightclub that held a club night called ‘Freshers Violation’ was subsequently shut down after online campaigners protested against the video. Movements like No More Page 3 and the Everyday Sexism project have catapulted feminist theory onto the dashboards and newsfeeds of millions of people across the web. News articles about lad culture are tweeted around the world. The best way to let UK universities know how we feel about lad culture is to let the whole world know first. The best way to draw attention to the problem is to talk about it publicly.

When a random pervert feels you up in the club, tweet about it. When a smarmy lad talks over you during a lecture, write a blog post about it. Send your stories to newspapers, feminist organisations, and projects. Get involved in your local feminist society and make publications, online petitions, and events that bring together women in your community. Tell your university why misogynistic environments are inappropriate for an institution of education. Make posters. Log onto sexist websites and argue your corner.

Campaign are being made, pledges are being written up, and while the opinions and thoughts of those involved in lad culture may not being altered immediately, the changes being written into higher education and gender equality policies have the potential to change the way people are taught, and therefore think, altogether. And those changes are being brought about due to the feminists that are making universities realise that this behaviour is unacceptable.

Let’s talk about the Men’s Rights Movement.

Yesterday at work, I sat at my desk and watched on the muted TV as news unfolded about another shooting in America. Seven people were dead, said the BBC news headline, including the shooter. Seven more people had been injured. The only things that really crossed my mind were “wow, another shooting?” and “I bet you anything that the shooter was a young, white male.” I had no idea that across the world, people were discovering that the shooter, now revealed to be 22-year-old student Elliot Rodger, was not only young, white, and male, but was also involved in a movement that all feminists detest and decry – the men’s rights movement.

His internet history reveals a lot about him. He was a member of an anti-woman forum called the Anti Pickup Artist movement’, which focussed on “the scams, deception, and misleading marketing techniques used by dating gurus and the seduction community to deceive men and profit from them. Some of their posts include:Are ugly women completely useless to society?” and Have any hot women ever committed suicide?” He was a frequent poster on several men’s rights activists forums. He was a member of a bodybuilding forum, and in one example created a thread entitled “I’m tired of seeing losers with hot chicks, in which he posted “Seriously, today at my college I saw this short, ugly Indian guy driving a Honda civic, and he had a hot blonde girl in his passenger seat. What on earth is up with that?!?!? I would climb mount Everest 10 times just to have a girl like that with me. I drive a BMW coupe and I’ve struggled all my life to get a girlfriend. What’s wrong with this world? Does anyone else get disturbed and offended when you see sights like this? Someone make sense of this ridiculousness.” Later on in the thread, another member mentioned that the topic seemed racist, and he responded with “Well, I find it unjust that a white girl would choose him over me.” Another member mentioned at one point, I see you got rid of those serial killer-esc videos on Youtube.”

He joined YouTube, where he was subscribed to several MRA channels as well as ones that gave advice on “how to be a pick up artist”, and in the space of 3 months had uploaded 21 videos, all of which consisted of rants about women and debates about why they didn’t like him. One, entitledWhy do girls hate me so much?”, describes his loneliness and misery, and blames it on the fact that the women of his university aren’t interested in him. “My problem is girls,” he says. “There are so many beautiful girls here, but none of them give me a chance, and I don’t know why. I don’t know why you girls are so repulsed by me. It doesn’t make sense. I do everything I can to appear attractive to you. I dress nice, I’m sophisticated, and magnificent.” In another, he uses a phrase that has been the subject of debate amongst young feminists for years, that has its own meme, and that has basically become the catchphrase for MRAs: “I’m such a nice guy, why won’t you give me a chance?“. But the most significant video is the one that has been circling the internet for the last 24 hours, the one which he opens by stating that it is his “last video”.

It’s not fair. You girls have never been attracted to me. I don’t know why you girls have never been attracted to me, but I will punish you all for it. It’s an injustice, a crime, because I don’t know what you don’t see in me. I’m the perfect guy, and yet you throw yourselves at all these obnoxious men, instead of me, the supreme gentleman. I will punish all of you for it. On the day of retribution I will enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB, and I will slaughter every single spoiled stuck up blonde slut I see inside there. All those girls that I’ve desired so much, they would have all rejected me and looked down upon me as an inferior man if I ever made a sexual advance towards them. While they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes. I’ll take great pleasure in slaughtering all of you. You will finally see that I am in truth the superior one. The true Alpha Male.

This 22-year-old student went out with the intention of murdering girls from his university because they wouldn’t sleep with him. He felt that it was justifiable for his to go and take the lives of innocent women because they didn’t flirt back when he tried out “pick up techniques” that he’d learned from the internet. He felt so entitled to sex and to love that when he didn’t get it, he felt that it was necessary to seek revenge. He felt that those girls owed him. He felt it was acceptable to punish anyone who wasn’t interested in him. And if this isn’t an example of male entitlement at its purest, then I don’t know what is. He uses language that permeates the forums of MRAs every day. “I am… the true Alpha male”; “I’m the perfect guy”; “the supreme gentleman”.

We need to talk about this. The Men’s Rights Movement has gone beyond a running joke now, and has become a serious sociological danger. There are entire communities online focussed on teaching men that women are the root of all their problems, and that women are the reason that they are unhappy. There are forums founded on the idea that men are the dominant class and women are subservient, and that men are entitled to women’s bodies. They preach that women are liars and cheaters and tricksters. They teach men to be degrading and hateful towards women. They are real, and they are out there, and if this horrific killing spree should teach us anything, it is that the words “nice guy” and “friendzone” are not trivial or humorous: they are dangerous.

We are living in a world where women are increasingly becoming more powerful. We are the majority when it comes to university admissions. We are racing ahead of men on the career ladder. We are sexually independent, make choices about our own bodies, and, for the most part, are no longer tied down to 19th century patriarchal male dominance. Men do not make our decisions for us. And as we become more independent and free-thinking, men are increasing their attempts to control and dominate us. Through the power of the internet, they are influencing the thoughts and opinions of younger and younger men. Websites that are aimed at the younger generation, like Reddit, 4Chan, and UniLad, are filled with rape jokes, derogatory humour, and degrading images. “If the girl […] won’t ‘spread for your head’, think about this mathematical statistic: 85% of rape cases go unreported. That seems to be fairly good odds” read one joke on the UniLad website. Just a few weeks ago, it was in the news that a 16-year-old student was choked and stabbed to death by a fellow student, for turning down his prom invitation. In 2010, the NUS report “Hidden Marks” revealed that 68% of respondents had faced one or more kinds of sexual harassment at university as a student. And, sickeningly, there are even people in these MRA communities that are defending Rodger’s actions. “Well girls, keep that in mind the next time you friendzone somebody!writes YouTube user overgamer13. “See girls, this is what you get for treating nice guys like shit” reads another YouTube comment.

So why are so many news reports describing this killing spree as the act of a madman, and not a rampant misogynist? Why are so many networks failing to even mention that Rodger had a video, let alone talk about the content within it? Yes, he may have been mentally unstable. But in his video he literally talks about the fact that his motive is his loneliness, which he blames on the women of his university. He talks about how he intends to “slaughter every single spoiled stuck up blonde slut”. How is this ok, and why aren’t more news channels talking about it? Why are people purposefully avoiding the subject of violence against women? How has this turned into another debate about gun laws and mental health?

And, in case you weren’t sure about whether or not a couple of videos prove that this murderer was a women-hating, entitled misogynist, here’s an extract from a piece written by him that has just been leaked on the internet:

The ultimate evil behind sexuality is the human female. They are the main instigators of sex. They control which men get it and which men don’t.  Women are flawed creatures, and my mistreatment at their hands has made me realize this sad truth. There is something very twisted and wrong with the way their brains are wired. They think like beasts, and in truth, they are beasts. Women are incapable of having morals or thinking rationally. They are completely controlled by their depraved emotions and vile sexual impulses. Because of this, the men who do get to experience the pleasures of sex and the privilege of breeding are the men who women are sexually  attracted to… the stupid, degenerate , obnoxious men. I have observed this all my life. The most beautiful of women choose to mate with the most brutal of men, instead of magnificent gentlemen like myself. Women should not have the right to choose who to mate and breed with. That decision should be made for them by rational men of intelligence. If women continue to have rights, they will only hinder the advancement of the human race by breeding with degenerate men and creating stupid, degenerate offspring. This will cause humanity to become even more depraved with each generation. Women have more power in human society than they deserve, all because of sex. There is no creature more evil and depraved than the human female. Women are like a plague. They don’t deserve to have any rights. Their wickedness must be contained in order prevent future generations from falling to degeneracy. Women are vicious, evil, barbaric animals, and they need to be treated as such.”

Here’s a link to the full piece [click].

This should be a conversation about violence against women, male entitlement, and misogyny – not a debate about how we should feel sorry for the poor little lonely privileged white boy.

FEM.ALE

ImageToday I went to the Plasterers Arms on Cowgate to talk to Erica Horton, the brains behind an upcoming festival running alongside the Norwich City of Ale Beer Festival 2014, called FEM.ALE. It’s a 3-day event that focuses on female brewers and the women who love to drink beer, and will include beer tastings, live music, and female-brewed beer available on all 15 pumps at the pub. The beer industry is quite possibly one of the most male-orientated industries out there, with women mainly making their appearances in the advertisements, on the logos, or behind the bar pulling the pints. And when beer companies do decide to attempt to target women, they do so with fruity flavours or low-calorie drinks, with one company even developing a “less gassy” brand specifically for women.  I talked to Erica, who is a member of the Norwich Feminist Network, about why a female-focused beer event is so important, and what her feelings are about the beer industry as a whole.

Image

 

Sophie Elliott: How did the idea of FEM.ALE come about?

Erica Horton: I’m part of the Norwich feminist network, who have meeting regularly to discuss local and international feminist issues. We wanted to have more of a casual meeting and go for drinks and stuff, and the more we talked about it the more we realised that a lot of the women enjoy drinking beer, so we thought we’d have a beer event but make it a bit more female orientated.

S.E: Why did you want to have an alternative festival to specifically celebrate female brewers?

E.H: The beer industry itself has lots of problems with reaching women, in terms of acknowledging that women are doing some really amazing things with beer. There are women brewing some really interesting things and there are some really great networks set up at the moment for women and female brewers – such as Project Venus, which is a network of women dedicated to educating women about beer, and who brew together every couple of months – so there was a great opportunity to draw attention to that and to celebrate it. Norwich is a city that loves beer and ale and quite a lot of women do like to drink it here, but elsewhere there are lots of problems with how women are represented within the production, distribution and serving, and consuming of beers. I’ve always noticed that quite often the beer taps will have a picture of a woman on it and the beer itself will be named after a woman, and I find that deeply upsetting because it is a form of commodifying women.

S.E: Let’s talk about advertising for beer companies. Do you think the degrading images of women mean it’s difficult for female brewers to be taken seriously? And do you think the male-orientated marketing puts off potential female beer drinkers?

E.H: I think that advertisements like that misrepresent women, and use them as a form of selling beer as opposed to depicting them making or buying it. Someone tweeted me the other day saying that beer is marketed towards men because that’s the bigger market, but by what definition is that a bigger market? There are more women in the world so surely that’s the bigger market? We’d like to change the idea that it is all for men. I’ve had tweets from people asking me if there are going to be women at the event wearing t-shirts soaked in beer, and stuff like that, and it’s horrible. Consistently it’s the bigger breweries that are encouraging this culture, like Fosters, and Stella, who are trying to make their advertisements more sophisticated but are still degrading women, and Budweiser, whose advertisements are absolutely ridiculous. So yes, advertising is definitely a big problem in how women are represented as brewers, beer makers and professionals.

S.E: Why do you think it’s important for women to get into beer brewing? Do you think your event will influence or inspire people to get into it?

E.H: That was one of the things I was interested in, for example getting women into the idea of home brewing. It’s a very different process to industrial or commercial brewing, which I didn’t know until I spoke to Jo C, a Norfolk Brewster who’s going to be doing a beer tasting at the event. She was saying how she can’t really recommend any tips for home brewing because she doesn’t know anything about it, because she makes big industrial tanks of beer. We hope to make women more visible in this industry, and to get more women together to talk about their experience and knowledge as professionals who know what they’re doing. I think it’s important to celebrate women striving in male-orientated industries, and to get all these women together in one place to mobilise their understanding and encourage other people.

S.E: What do you hope to get out of FEM.ALE? What’s the message you want people to take away with them?

E.H: It’s a great opportunity to celebrate women who are in the beer industry, and to create a nice women-friendly space. Obviously it’s inclusive and men should definitely come along as well, but to create one space in this city of ale beer festival where it’s particularly female-orientated would be really nice. It’s something that the feminist network was very interested in. Big groups of women, drinking beer? Brilliant.

S.E: Will you be doing it again next year? Have you thought about expanding the event?

E.H: I’m hoping to do it again. We’ve already been talking to the Norwich Arts Centre who want to expand it next year and turn it into a bigger thing, but that’s in the very early stages. We don’t know what that will be like, but yes, we’re hoping to do it again, and if there’s the opportunity to expand then that’d be great. There’d obviously be a much bigger team doing it and a lot more delegation going on. But I’ve got to finish my PhD first! [laughs]

The FEM.ALE 3-day event takes place from the 23rd until the 25th of May, at the Plasterers Arms in Norwich. Event details can be found here.